I quite admit that modern novels have many good points. All I insist on is that, as a class, they are quite unreadable.
Send
I quite admit that modern novels have many good points. All I insist on is that, as a class, they are quite unreadable.
From the point of view of literature Mr. Kipling is a genius who drops his aspirates.
Anybody can write a three-volume novel. It merely requires a complete ignorance of both life and literature.
There is no such thing as a moral or immoral book. Books are either well written or badly written. That is all.
The difference between literature and journalism is that journalism is unreadable, and literature is not read.
Modern journalism justifies its own existence by the great Darwinian principle of the survival of the vulgares. I have only to do with literature.
The transformation of Dr Jekyll reads dangerously like an experiment out of the Lancet.
Are there ideas to make books better? I'm afraid not.
It must be perfectly easy in half an hour to say whether a book is worth anything or worth nothing. Ten minutes are really sufficient, if one has the instinct for form.
The good ended happily, and the bad unhappily. That is what Fiction means.